Physical Science Amantine's selected Arxiv paper: Scientific alternatives to the anthropic principle

Discussion in 'Physical Science' started by amantine, Sep 6, 2004.

  1. amantine

    amantine Premium Member

    Amantine\'s selected Arxiv paper: Scientific alternatives to the anthropic principle

    Every once in a while, I come across an interesting Arxiv paper. I decided to make it a kind of column.

    Today, I've decided to go for Scientific alternatives to the anthropic principle, by Lee Smolin, one of the key proponents of the quantum loop gravity theory. The paper is a critique on the anthropic principle. The anthropic principle says basicly, that our universe and its constants are the way they are because otherwise we would not be here to observe.

    This is a reasonable idea, but Smolin says that it should not be used in physics because it isn't falsifiable. He also lists some other problems with the principle and explains a solution to the finetuned constants of the universe that is falsifiable.

    The abstract:
    What's your opinion? Should we use the anthropic principle to explain the universe or should we keep looking for theories that can explain them?
     
  2. amantine

    amantine Premium Member

    Edge 145 has a discussion between Smolin and Susskind about the anthropic principle. Smolin is one of the developers of loop quantum gravity and Susskind is the discoverer of string theory. Two heavyweights of theoretical physics battle it out!